Ratings · Exchanges · 6 measured
The best crypto exchanges, ranked on what a trade costs and what backs your balance
We priced the same $10,000 bitcoin buy on 30 exchanges' live order books — the dearest cost about eighteen times the cheapest. Then we checked every proof-of-reserves, licence and enforcement record behind them. The cheapest venue is not the winner.
The short answer
The best crypto exchange in our ranking is Kraken, at 7.8 out of 10, and it leads on custody rather than price. Custody carries 40% of the score, and Kraken publishes a quarterly, third-party-attested proof of reserves that includes client liabilities. The trade-off is cost: a $10,000 bitcoin market buy cost about 0.26% there, against about 0.10% at Binance and OKX and about 0.60% at Coinbase. Trading costs were measured from live order books on 14 July 2026, and custody and licence facts were researched the same day. Check availability in your country before you compare prices, because the cheapest venue may not serve you.
The verdict, in three lines
cost measured 14 Jul 2026, 12:00 UTC- Best overall
- Kraken 7.8/10
- Cheapest to trade
- OKX 0.1% on $10k
- Weakest evidence your money is there
- LBank 2/10 custody
Custody carries 40% of the score, so the cheapest venue does not win. Why we weight it that way.
⚠ The cheapest venue may not be open to you — check the availability column before the price.
Which one should you use?
four situationsIt has the strongest evidence that customer money is really there, works in every state except Maine and New York, and its fees are published upfront. You pay about $26 on a $10,000 trade — roughly $16 more than the cheapest venue, which is the price of the safest custody record in the table.
Both are licensed to serve you and both can prove their reserves. Bitvavo is the largest euro venue and keeps customer assets in a separate legal entity, so the company’s own finances cannot touch them. Binance is cheaper and has suspended most EU services since July 2026.
About $10 on a $10,000 trade, the joint-cheapest of the six venues we scored in full, and level with most of the large global venues. The trade-off is custody evidence nobody outside the company signs off, and a 2025 guilty plea in a US federal court. Cheap is a real advantage; it is not the same as safe.
Every venue in this table is a company holding your money. For anything you are not actively trading, a hardware wallet removes that company from the equation entirely — our top pick costs less than the fees on a single large trade.
All 29 exchanges: cost, and where you can use them
cost measured 14 Jul 2026, 12:00 UTC| # | Exchange | Our scoreout of 10 | What a $10,000 trade costsfee + spread, measured | Can you check your money is there?who verifies it | Can you open an account?US · EU · UK |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 1 | 7.8 | $260.26% of the trade | Yes — an outside firm checks | US some statesEU ✓UK ✓ | |
| 2 | 7.3 | $100.1% of the trade | Only their own word | US some statesEU ✓UK some states | |
| 3 | 7.2 | $60.0565% of the trade | Yes — an outside firm checks | US ✕EU ✕UK ✕ | |
| 4 | 7.1 | not measuredHTTP 403 | Yes — an outside firm checks | US ✕EU ✓UK ✕ | |
| 5 | 7.1 | $100.1% of the trade | Yes — an outside firm checks | US ✕EU some statesUK some statesYes — confirmed | |
| 6 | 7.0 | $50.05% of the trade | Yes — an outside firm checks | US ✕EU ✕UK ? | |
| 7 | 6.8 | $100.1% of the trade | Only their own word | US some statesEU ✕UK ✕ | |
| 8 | 6.8 | $100.1% of the trade | A page with no numbers in it | US ✕EU ✕UK ? | |
| 9 | 6.6 | $600.6001% of the trade | No — nothing to check | US ✓EU ✓UK ✓ | |
| 10 | 6.5 | $100.1045% of the trade | Out of date | US ✕EU ✓UK ? | |
| 11 | 6.5 | $300.3% of the trade | No — nothing to check | US ✓EU ✓UK ✓ | |
| 12 | 6.3 | not measuredHTTP 451 | Partly — audited accounts only | US ✓EU leftUK left | |
| 13 | 6.3 | $100.1032% of the trade | Only their own word | US ✕EU ✕UK ✕Promised, unconfirmed | |
| 14 | 5.9 | $250.25% of the trade | Out of date | US some statesEU ✓UK ✓ | |
| 15 | 5.5 | $100.1001% of the trade | Only their own word | US ✕EU ✕UK ✕Promised, unconfirmed | |
| 16 | 5.4 | $100.1% of the trade | Only their own word | US ✕EU ✕UK ✕ | |
| 17 | 5.4 | $660.6574% of the trade | Only their own word | US ?EU ✕UK ? | |
| 18 | 5.1 | $210.2063% of the trade | Only their own word | US some statesEU ✓UK ✕Promised, unconfirmed | |
| 19 | 5.0 | $100.098% of the trade | A page with no numbers in it | US ✕EU ✕UK ?Yes — confirmed | |
| 20 | 4.9 | $200.2% of the trade | Only their own word | US ✕EU ✕UK ✕ | |
| 21 | 4.8 | $210.2062% of the trade | Only their own word | US ✕EU ✕UK ✕ | |
| 22 | 4.6 | $200.2% of the trade | Only their own word | US ✕EU ✕UK ✕Promised, unconfirmed | |
| 23 | 4.5 | $200.2% of the trade | Out of date | US ✕EU ?UK ✕ | |
| 24 | 4.4 | $240.2412% of the trade | Only their own word | US ✕EU ✕UK ✕Promised, unconfirmed | |
| 25 | 4.3 | $900.8967% of the trade | Partly — audited accounts only | US ✕EU ?UK ? | |
| 26 | 3.8 | $100.1% of the trade | A page with no numbers in it | US ✕EU ✕UK ? | |
| — | 3.2 | $250.25% of the trade | No — nothing to check | US —EU —UK —No — still unpaid | |
| — | 3.9 | $230.2327% of the trade | Only their own word | US —EU —UK —Promised, unconfirmed | |
| — | AscendEXDEFUNCTi | — | not measuredUnexpected token '<', "<!doc | not yet researched | US —EU —UK —Promised, unconfirmed |
Cost and depth are measured by us from each venue’s live public order book; taker fees are the venues’ own published rates. Availability is sourced to each company’s own terms or a regulator’s register — hover any cell for the detail.
Read the cost column carefully. We measure the global order book. Where a company serves the US through a separate arm (Binance.US, OKX US, Gate US), that platform has its own, usually thinner book — the number here is not the one an American would get.
The cost column is what a $10,000 market buy of bitcoin actually cost us on that venue — the trading fee plus the gap between the price shown and the price you get. We walked each order book ourselves rather than reading the fee page. Click any exchange for the full reasoning behind its score.
No longer trading
3 venues⚠ BitMart
WINDING DOWN. BitMart stopped registrations, deposits and new orders on 26 July 2026 and ended all trading on 26 August 2026; it plans to end platform operations on 31 January 2027, with White & Case and Alvarez & Marsal advising on a possible restructuring. Do not sign up. If you hold a balance, follow BitMart’s own withdrawal notices. We list it because thousands of readers still search for it.
BitMart’s notice ↗⚠ CoinEx
CLOSING. CoinEx ended futures on 22 September and spot trading on 29 September 2026. Withdrawals stay open until 22 December 2026, 02:00 UTC, when the platform closes; after that, unwithdrawn USDT moves to independent custody with a monthly fee of 5% of the balance, and claims run by email until 22 August 2028. Do not sign up. If you hold a balance, withdraw it before 22 December.
CoinEx’s notice ↗⚠ AscendEX
CEASED OPERATIONS on 1 July 2026 after failing to obtain a MiCA licence, amid a liquidity crisis. Withdrawals were moved to manual review with no guarantee of processing. Our own measurement run could not reach its order book — the API returns a web page. Do not sign up. We list it because a comparison that quietly deletes the venue that just collapsed teaches the reader nothing.
They stay listed, unranked, because people still search for them and need to know how to get their money out. A ranking refreshed once a quarter would still be recommending them. How we measure
Guide
Understanding crypto exchanges
What a crypto exchange actually does with your money
A centralized crypto exchange is two businesses at once: a marketplace that matches buyers and sellers, and a custodian that holds the coins and cash in your account. Most guides judge only the first. We weight the second more heavily because it decides what happens to your balance if the company fails.
When you deposit, the exchange takes control of the assets, and your account shows a claim on it. Ethereum's own wallet guide puts it plainly: an exchange holds custody for you, and if it runs into financial trouble, those funds are at risk. In the US, FDIC deposit insurance does not cover crypto assets, and it does not protect against the insolvency of a non-bank company such as an exchange, broker or wallet provider.
Coinbase's own annual filing warns that customer assets are substantially larger than its corporate assets and insurance, and that in a bankruptcy customers could be treated as general unsecured creditors. That risk factor applies, in some form, to every venue on this page.
How to choose the best crypto exchange for you
Choose on custody evidence first, availability second, and cost third. Each of our weighted criteria protects you from a specific failure:
- Custody of funds (40%): protects you from an exchange that does not actually hold what it owes. Look for a proof of reserves that counts liabilities, a named attestor, and a record of paying users back after incidents.
- True cost (16%) and liquidity (11%): protect you from paying more than the fee page suggests, especially on larger orders that move through a thin order book.
- Fiat on and off ramps (11%): protect you from being able to deposit dollars or euros but not withdraw them on the same terms.
- Assets and networks (9%): protect you from sending a token over a network the venue does not support.
- KYC and access (8%): protect you from discovering your withdrawal limit only after you have deposited.
- Product, API and docs (5%): matter mostly to active traders who need documented rate limits and a public status page.
For beginners, the practical order is the same. A polished crypto app is easy to find. Evidence that the company behind it can return your money is harder to find, and that is the part to check.
Crypto exchange fees compared: what a trade really costs
The cost of a trade is the taker fee plus the spread plus any slippage, not the fee shown on the price list. A taker order is one that fills immediately against orders already on the book, which is what a market buy does. A maker order rests on the book and usually pays less, as Kraken's fee documentation explains.
In our 14 July 2026 measurement, the effective cost of a $10,000 bitcoin market buy ranged from about 0.05% at Upbit and MEXC to about 0.90% at Independent Reserve. Kraken came to 0.26%, Bitstamp 0.30% and Coinbase about 0.60%. At $10,000 most of that is the taker fee. Slippage was near zero on the deep books.
Size changes the picture. On a $100,000 order, Independent Reserve's slippage alone reached about 0.58%, while Binance, OKX and Kraken stayed within a thousandth of a percent of their $10,000 cost. If you trade large amounts, depth matters more than the headline fee.
Two costs sit outside these figures: the markup on network withdrawal fees, and the wider spread inside one-click buy or convert screens. Our guide to what a $10,000 trade really costs works through both.
Best crypto exchange by country: US, EU and UK
The right exchange depends on where you live, because licences, not features, decide who can open an account. Our availability data covers the US, the EU and the UK.
In the US, Coinbase serves all 50 states, and Kraken serves every state except Maine and New York, with product limits in several others. In the EU, the Markets in Crypto-Assets Regulation (MiCA) now governs exchanges. ESMA confirms that the transitional period allowing firms to keep operating under national rules ran to 1 July 2026 at the latest, and ESMA publishes a register of authorized providers that you can search. Binance withdrew its MiCA application and has restricted EU services since that date. Kraken, Coinbase and Bitstamp hold MiCA licences and FCA registrations in the UK.
A licence is not the same as availability. Gemini holds a Maltese MiCA licence and has still closed its EU, UK and Australian accounts. For the US question in more depth, see which exchanges Americans can use.
What has gone wrong at exchanges, and what it tells you
The useful question after an incident is not whether an exchange was hacked but whether users were made whole. Our data includes both outcomes.
Bybit lost roughly $1.4 to $1.5 billion in February 2025 through a compromised third-party signing tool, kept withdrawals open, and no user lost money. Several other venues pledged reimbursement after hacks with no independent confirmation that it was paid, including Poloniex, CoinEx, HTX and KuCoin. Gate has a user-fund incident from July 2026 that was still uncompensated when we published. AscendEX collapsed on 1 July 2026 and is listed as defunct, not ranked.
Insurance claims need the same scrutiny. Several "insurance funds" are derivatives liquidation backstops, not theft cover. Bybit's roughly $986 million fund is one, by our reading. MEXC's $100 million theft fund is the only one in our table with a published on-chain address you can check yourself.
Getting in and getting out
Treat an exchange as a place to convert money, not a place to store it. Before you deposit, find the withdrawal limits for your verification tier and the network fee for the asset you plan to withdraw. A venue that will not show you either before sign-up is marked down in our KYC criterion.
After you buy, a test withdrawal of a small amount to a wallet you control confirms the route works before you move the rest. Our step-by-step guide on moving crypto off an exchange covers addresses, networks and test transactions. If you want to check a venue's reserves yourself, start with Kraken's Merkle-tree model: each client can confirm that their own balance is in the audited snapshot.
Before you choose
7 checks- Search ESMA's MiCA register (EU) or the FCA register (UK) for the exact legal entity that will hold your account.
- Open the exchange's proof-of-reserves page and confirm it counts client liabilities, names an attestor, and shows a snapshot date within the last few months.
- Price your real order size: compare the taker fee plus the quoted spread, not the maker fee in the headline.
- Read whether an advertised insurance fund covers theft or only derivatives liquidations, and whether its address is published.
- Find your withdrawal limit for the verification tier you will actually reach before you deposit.
- Check the venue's incident history for the outcome: were users paid back, and is that confirmed by someone other than the exchange?
- Send a small test withdrawal to your own wallet before moving a larger balance.
Terms on this page
8 terms- Proof of reserves (PoR)
- A published check that an exchange holds at least the assets it owes clients. It means little unless it also counts liabilities and is attested by a named third party.
- Merkle tree
- A data structure that lets an auditor publish a single fingerprint of all client balances. Each client can then confirm their own balance is included without seeing anyone else's.
- Taker fee
- The fee charged when your order fills immediately against an order already on the book. Market orders pay it.
- Maker fee
- The usually lower fee charged when your order rests on the book and is filled later by someone else.
- Slippage
- The difference between the best quoted price and the average price you actually get as a large order works through the order book.
- Effective cost
- Our measured total for a trade: taker fee plus spread plus slippage, as a percentage of the order.
- MiCA CASP
- A crypto-asset service provider authorized under the EU's Markets in Crypto-Assets Regulation, which can passport its licence across member states.
- Insurance fund
- A reserve an exchange says it holds against losses. Many cover only derivatives liquidations, not theft of client assets.
How we scored this
weights sum to 100Every criterion carries a published weight and the weights sum to 100. Custody takes 40% of it, deliberately. There is no “support” score: judging it honestly means opening real tickets and timing the replies, and we have not done that. It returns when we do — with a changelog entry saying so.
Custody of funds40%
Proof-of-reserves: does it exist, who attests it, does it include liabilities (a PoR without liabilities is close to meaningless), how often. Insurance fund: size, is the address public, and has it ever actually paid out. Hack history — and above all whether users were made whole. Licences by jurisdiction, and the enforcement record behind them. Every claim here is sourced to a primary document: a regulator’s register, a court filing, or the venue’s own published proof.
True cost of trading16%
Measured by us, not read off a fee page. We walk the live order book and fill $1,000 / $10,000 / $100,000 of BTC/USDT, then add the venue’s published taker fee. That sum — fee + spread + realised slippage — is the effective cost. Separately: the markup on network withdrawal fees, and the hidden spread inside “convert” / “buy in one click” flows.
Liquidity and execution11%
Order-book depth within ±0.1% and ±0.5% of mid, measured from the live book. Uptime over 12 months from the status page. Behaviour under stress: were there outages on days the market moved more than 5%.
Assets and networks9%
Number of pairs, adjusted for quality: the share of listings delisted within a year. Which networks are actually supported for deposit and withdrawal — not merely “supports USDT”.
Fiat on/off ramp11%
Which methods are actually available per country, their fees, and their limits per verification tier — read from the venue’s published terms and cited. Where a venue does not publish this, that opacity is itself the finding, and it scores accordingly.
KYC and access8%
Verification tiers and their limits, what is genuinely usable without verification, and the country deny-list — from the venue’s published policy, cited. A venue that will not tell you your withdrawal ceiling before you sign up is marked down for it.
Product, API and docs5%
API documentation quality, whether rate limits are documented, whether a public status page with uptime history exists, and the API response latency we measured ourselves while pulling the order book.
Weights sum to 100. A criterion we cannot verify is deleted, not guessed. Full methodology →
Every exchange, one page each
29 profilesOne profile per company — not per legal entity. Each page carries our measurements, the per-criterion scorecard, the proof-of-reserves position, regional access with sources, and the incident record with the only question that decides it: did users get their money back?
Who we excluded, and why
3 excludedA rating that contains only winners is a catalogue. These are the hard gates: fail one and no fee, volume or score gets you into the table.
Global disqualifier. If a custodial business will neither show its reserves nor answer to a regulator, there is nothing to rate — you are trusting a promise. We do not rank promises.
We size real orders against the live book. Where the depth cannot support the volume a venue reports, the volume figure is doing marketing, not reporting. Excluded rather than rated.
Global disqualifier, regardless of fees or liquidity. Note how this cuts: Bybit lost the largest sum in exchange history and is still in the table, because users were made whole and withdrawals never stopped. The test is not whether something went wrong. It is what happened to your money afterwards.
- × No proof-of-reserves and no licence.
- × Funds not returned to users after a hack.
- × A pattern of complaints about blocked withdrawals.
- × Confirmed wash trading.
Our raw measurements
26 venues · undefinedThe full capture behind the cost column. One timestamp, the same pair and order sizes — reproducible by anyone willing to run the same walk against the same public endpoints.
| Venue | Best ask | Spread | Taker | Slip $1k | Slip $10k | Slip $100k | API latency |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Binance | 62,860.73 | 0% | 0.1% | 0% | 0% | 0 | 460 ms |
| Coinbase | 62,789.62 | 0% | 0.6% | 0% | 0.0001% | 0.0039 | 183 ms |
| Kraken | 62,793.5 | 0.0002% | 0.26% | 0% | 0% | 0.001 | 224 ms |
| OKX | 62,864.8 | 0.0002% | 0.1% | 0% | 0% | 0.0005 | 330 ms |
| Bybit | 62,867.2 | 0.0002% | 0.1% | 0% | 0% | 0.0043 | 254 ms |
| Gate.io | 62,843.1 | 0.0002% | 0.2% | 0% | 0.0063% | 0.0206 | 3028 ms |
| KuCoin | 62,858.7 | 0.0002% | 0.1% | 0% | 0% | 0.0036 | 465 ms |
| Bitget | 62,860 | 0% | 0.1% | 0% | 0% | 0.0081 | 521 ms |
| MEXC | 62,857.57 | 0% | 0.05% | 0.0003% | 0.0065% | 0.009 | 456 ms |
| HTX | 62,859.8 | 0% | 0.2% | 0% | 0.0062% | 0.0165 | 468 ms |
| Crypto.com | 62,803.5 | 0% | 0.25% | 0% | 0% | 0.0023 | 572 ms |
| Bitfinex | 62,900 | 0.0159% | 0.2% | 0% | 0% | 0.0162 | 350 ms |
| Bitstamp | 62,785.09 | 0% | 0.3% | 0% | 0% | 0.0083 | 320 ms |
| BingX | 62,860.73 | 0% | 0.1% | 0.002% | 0.0032% | 0.0061 | 460 ms |
| BitMart | 62,860.74 | 0% | 0.25% | 0% | 0% | 0 | 631 ms |
| LBank | 62,861.02 | 0% | 0.1% | 0% | 0% | 0 | 1067 ms |
| Phemex | 62,865.23 | 0.0263% | 0.1% | 0% | 0.0001% | 0.0185 | 911 ms |
| WhiteBIT | 62,863.78 | 0% | 0.1% | 0% | 0.0045% | 0.0181 | 364 ms |
| CoinEx | 62,846 | 0.0016% | 0.2% | 0.0098% | 0.0327% | 0.0508 | 595 ms |
| Poloniex | 62,861.28 | 0.0144% | 0.2% | 0.0336% | 0.0412% | 0.0539 | 588 ms |
| Bitrue | 62,860.73 | 0% | 0.098% | 0% | 0% | 0.0031 | 1050 ms |
| DigiFinex | 62,860.73 | 0% | 0.2% | 0% | 0% | 0 | 668 ms |
| XT.com | 62,860.73 | 0% | 0.2% | 0% | 0% | 0 | 542 ms |
| Upbit | 92,960,000 | 0.0097% | 0.05% | 0% | 0% | 0 | 2390 ms |
| Bitso | 62,809 | 0.0318% | 0.65% | 0.002% | 0.0074% | 0.0093 | 600 ms |
| Independent Reserve | 62,786.97 | 0.0366% | 0.5% | 0% | 0.3967% | 0.5799 | 2627 ms |
Captured 14 Jul 2026, 12:00 UTC · pair · ChainWatch Daily automated Level-A runner
Spread, depth and slippage are measured by us from each venue’s live public order book at measuredAt. Taker fees are the venues’ own published entry-tier rates (sourced, not measured). Effective cost combines the two. Venues that could not be measured are listed with the reason rather than dropped. No field test (deposit/withdraw/support) is included — that is Level B and requires a funded account.
What changed since the last update
5 entriesMethodology changes are published, not applied quietly. A ranking that reshuffles without saying why is just an opinion with a fresh date on it.
BitMart and CoinEx marked as no longer trading. BitMart ended all trading on 26 August 2026 and plans to end operations on 31 January 2027; CoinEx ended spot trading on 29 September 2026 and closes for withdrawals on 22 December 2026. Both stay in the table, unranked, with their closure notices linked. XT.com now publishes a self-published reserves snapshot for four assets (7 October 2026, no auditor), replacing a page that read “No data”: its custody score moves from 2 to 3, and the UK is no longer on its prohibited list, although it remains on the FCA warning list. The cheapest-venue answer now reflects the full 30-venue run rather than the original six.
The “support” criterion was REMOVED, not left unscored. Judging support honestly means opening real tickets as a paying customer and timing the replies; we have not done that. Rather than carry a 5% placeholder marked n/a — which quietly dilutes every other weight and lets a score hide behind an asterisk — we deleted the criterion and redistributed its weight across criteria we can actually verify. Scores now rest on 100% of the published methodology. If we later run the tickets, the criterion comes back and this changelog will say so on the day it does.
Custody weight raised from 25% to 40%, making it the dominant criterion. Cost fell to 16%, liquidity to 11%, assets to 9%, UX to 5%. Reason: an exchange is a custodian before it is a marketplace. A 0.5% cost difference is worth $50 on a $10,000 trade; a custody failure is worth $10,000. Weighting them close together implied a trade-off that does not exist. The reshuffle moved Kraken to first and dropped Binance from second to fourth — the ranking now rewards what protects your balance rather than what shaves basis points off a fill.
Custody, fiat, KYC and product criteria closed with sourced public-record research: proof-of-reserves attestation (does it include liabilities? is there a named third-party auditor?), licence registers, enforcement records, and — the question that matters most — whether users got their money back after each incident. Every claim about a named company now carries a link to a primary document.
First publication. Effective trading cost measured by walking each venue’s live order book at $1k / $10k / $100k, rather than quoting fee schedules.
Is there a free alternative?
Do you need a centralised exchange at all?
For buying and holding, you need an exchange once — to convert fiat into crypto — and then you should leave. Custody on any venue above means the keys are not yours, and the strongest evidence in this whole table is not a fee or a reserve ratio: it is that two of these six had to reimburse customers after something went wrong, and one still has an open case. If your plan is to hold rather than trade, buy on the cheapest venue that legally serves your country, withdraw to a wallet you control, and stop reading exchange rankings — including this one. If you are swapping between crypto assets rather than touching fiat, a decentralised exchange removes the custodian from the transaction entirely, at the cost of gas and managing your own keys. Neither route earns us anything, which is exactly why you are reading it here.
Frequently asked questions
10 questionsWhich crypto exchange is actually the cheapest?
On our 14 July 2026 run across 30 venues, Upbit was cheapest at about 0.05% effective cost on a $10,000 bitcoin market buy, then MEXC at about 0.06% and Bitrue at about 0.10%, with Binance, OKX, Bybit, KuCoin and Bitget level at 0.10% — essentially the taker fee with no measurable slippage. Coinbase cost about 0.60%, six times Binance for the identical trade, and Independent Reserve about 0.90%. But cheapest is not the same as available: Upbit in practice serves only Korean residents, and none of the three cheapest is open to US or EU customers. Check the availability column before the price.
Can EU users still use Binance?
Not normally. Binance failed to obtain a MiCA licence, withdrew its EU application on 24 June 2026, and has restricted services to EU/EEA users since 1 July 2026. Withdrawals remain open. If you are in the EU, the fee advantage is moot — you need a venue that is actually licensed to serve you, such as Kraken, Coinbase, OKX, Bybit or Gate, all of which hold MiCA authorisations.
Is Bybit safe after the $1.5 billion hack?
The February 2025 theft was the largest in exchange history, and the FBI attributed it to North Korean actors. But the attackers compromised a third-party signing tool’s front-end, not Bybit’s own systems, and — the part that matters — no user lost money. Withdrawals were never halted, the gap was closed within about 72 hours, and independent monthly proof-of-reserves audits have shown over 100% coverage since. By our own disqualifier (funds not returned to users), Bybit passes. Its real weakness is elsewhere: direct fiat rails exist in only two currencies.
Why is your cost figure different from the exchange’s fee page?
Because a fee page is not the price. What you pay is the taker fee plus the spread plus the slippage your order causes as it eats through the book. We compute that by walking each venue’s live order book with a real order size, so the number reflects execution rather than marketing.
Which exchange has the strongest proof of reserves?
Kraken and Bybit. Both publish a proof-of-reserves that includes client liabilities and is attested by a named third party — Kraken quarterly, Bybit monthly. Binance, OKX and Gate publish cryptographically sound proofs with no independent attestor, and Binance corrected its own reserve-ratio calculation in January 2026 after it had been overstating coverage. Coinbase publishes no crypto proof-of-reserves at all, relying instead on audited public-company financial statements.
Do you earn money if I sign up through your links?
No. There is not a single affiliate link on this page — every link is direct. Nobody can buy a place in this ranking, accelerate inclusion or influence a score. That is precisely why this page can tell you that the cheapest move might be to not use an exchange at all.
Is my money insured on a crypto exchange?
Usually not in the way a bank deposit is. The FDIC states that its deposit insurance does not cover crypto assets and does not protect against the failure of a non-bank company such as an exchange. Some venues hold commercial crime policies or theft funds, but those are private arrangements with their own limits. Kraken, for example, states it has no user-protection fund at all, and says so plainly.
What is the best crypto exchange for beginners?
In our ranking, Kraken is the strongest starting point for a US beginner outside Maine and New York, because it combines the best custody evidence we found with published fees and fiat rails. Beginners pay more for the simplest buy screens, so place a regular order on the trading screen rather than using one-click buy, and withdraw anything you are not actively trading.
Does a higher trading volume make an exchange safer?
No. Volume says how much trading happens, not whether client assets are fully backed. Several high-volume venues in our table score low on custody, and we exclude venues whose reported volume their order book cannot support. Depth near the mid price, which we measure directly, is a better guide to whether your order will fill at a fair price.
How often do you re-measure trading costs?
The cost and liquidity figures come from a single dated capture of each venue's live order book, currently 14 July 2026, published with the raw numbers so anyone can repeat the walk. Fees and books change, so a re-run can move the cost column. Methodology changes are published in the changelog on this page rather than applied quietly.
Sources for the guide
6 sourcesHow this is funded
Nothing on this site is for sale. No affiliate links, no paid placements, no sponsored posts, no guest articles — not in this ranking and not anywhere else on the domain. Nobody can purchase a rank, accelerate inclusion or influence a score, and no company in this table has ever paid us anything.
That is the reason this page can put a $4.3bn guilty plea in the fourth row, rank a venue that is 2.6× more expensive in first place, and end by telling you the smartest move may be to use no exchange at all. Full funding policy →