Revolut: crypto cards rating breakdown
Revolut · US partner bank
A polished neobank card with real fee transparency — it publishes its crypto trading fees in a tiered table — and no proprietary token to lock up. As a general card it is excellent.
A polished neobank card with real fee transparency — it publishes its crypto trading fees in a tiered table — and no proprietary token to lock up. As a general card it is excellent.
How the score is built
Each criterion is scored 0–10 and weighted. The median column is the middle score across every entry in this ranking, so a row reads as a position rather than a number.
| Criterion | What we measured | Weight | Score | Category median | Rank | Weighted gap |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Reward you actually keep | — | 25% | 8 | 5 | 2 of 11 | +0.75 |
| Is the real cost disclosed? | — | 25% | 6 | 4 | 5 of 11 | +0.50 |
| Issuer and program safety | — | 20% | 6 | 6 | 6 of 11 | 0.00 |
| US availability | — | 15% | 4 | 0 | 5 of 11 | +0.60 |
| Net value on public terms | — | 10% | 3 | 5 | 8 of 11 | -0.20 |
| Product | — | 5% | 8 | 6 | 1 of 11 | +0.10 |
Measured 15 July 2026 · weights and method · decided by reward you actually keep, worth +0.75 points against the median
Reward you actually keep: 8/10
Not the headline percentage — the reward net of what earning it costs. Where the rate is gated behind staking a volatile issuer token, we price that stake against the token’s real drawdown and ask whether a cash alternative exists. A card that pays a flat rate in Bitcoin with nothing to lock up keeps its whole number; a card whose 8% requires locking a token down 96% from its high does not.
Scored 8 of 10 against a category median of 5, which places it 2nd of 11 among crypto cards on this criterion. At a 25% weight that is 0.75 points above the median contribution of the weighted total. The best score in the category is 10, the worst 0.
Is the real cost disclosed?: 6/10
The cost that touches every purchase is the crypto-to-fiat conversion spread at the till, and almost nobody states it as a number. We check whether the spread and the foreign-exchange markup are published. Two exchanges disclose more than the US market leader; several disclose nothing and say only that charges “may apply”.
Scored 6 of 10 against a category median of 4, which places it 5th of 11 among crypto cards on this criterion. At a 25% weight that is 0.50 points above the median contribution of the weighted total. The best score in the category is 10, the worst 0.
Issuer and program safety: 6/10
Who actually issues the card — the real bank or e-money institution behind the brand — and what happens to your balance if the program stops. Program suspensions are not hypothetical: the 2020 Wirecard collapse froze several of these cards overnight, and BlockFi’s card died with its bankruptcy. A real, named, regulated issuer scores; an opaque one does not.
Scored 6 of 10 against a category median of 6, which places it 6th of 11 among crypto cards on this criterion. At a 20% weight that is exactly level with the median of the weighted total. The best score in the category is 9, the worst 0.
US availability: 4/10
Whether an American can actually get the card, and in which states. Several of the highest-headline cards are unavailable in the US entirely, which for our audience settles the matter regardless of the rate.
Scored 4 of 10 against a category median of 0, which places it 5th of 11 among crypto cards on this criterion. At a 15% weight that is 0.60 points above the median contribution of the weighted total. The best score in the category is 10, the worst 0.
Net value on public terms: 3/10
The honest arithmetic on a realistic $24,000/year of spending, from the issuer’s own published terms and public token prices — including the opportunity cost of any locked capital and the token’s realised return. Where the net is positive we say so; where it is negative we show the working.
Scored 3 of 10 against a category median of 5, which places it 8th of 11 among crypto cards on this criterion. At a 10% weight that is 0.20 points below the median contribution of the weighted total. The best score in the category is 8, the worst 0.
Product: 8/10
The app, Apple and Google Pay support, virtual cards, and ATM access — the ordinary things that make a card usable.
Scored 8 of 10 against a category median of 6, which places it 1st of 11 among crypto cards on this criterion. At a 5% weight that is 0.10 points above the median contribution of the weighted total. The best score in the category is 8, the worst 0.
Other measurements
Its nearest neighbours in this ranking
| # | Entry | Reward you actually keep | How it differs |
|---|---|---|---|
| 2 | Coinbase One Card | 8 | Level on reward you actually keep; the gap is elsewhere. |
| 3 | Uphold Card | 8 | Level on reward you actually keep; the gap is elsewhere. |
| 5 | Crypto.com Visa | 5 | Behind by 3 on reward you actually keep. |
Questions about this score
Is crypto held in Revolut actually mine?
+
It is a custodial balance with Revolut, and in most configurations you cannot withdraw it to an external wallet as freely as from an exchange. Treat it as exposure to a price rather than as ownership of an asset — which is a real distinction if the company's terms or your account status ever change.
Does Revolut charge a hidden spread on crypto?
+
It publishes tiered trading fees, which is more disclosure than most of this category offers. Compare the all-in quote against the market rate before a large conversion — publishing a fee table does not by itself mean the total cost matches a dedicated exchange.